When we look at Roots outside of its historical context, we can see that it's nothing if not an ode to the importance of connecting to one's past. What's more, it seems to argue that without our pasts, we're fundamentally incomplete.
That's some serious stuff.
Still, if you look at the novel through this lens, you just might walk away with insight into your own past, as well how that past continues to shape you even today.
Questions About Memory and the Past
- Does it matter if Roots is not entirely historically accurate? Explain.
- What does the novel convey about the nature of oral traditions?
- Why is it so important for Kunta to hold onto his past?
- Does Kunta's relationship with his past change over time? Why or why not?
Chew on This
Try on an opinion or two, start a debate, or play the devil’s advocate.
It doesn't matter if Roots is entirely factually accurate, because the novel still conveys important truths.
It matters if Roots is factually accurate because otherwise Haley's observations hold no weight.