Likes this.

But don't you think that, by privileging the ontotheological status of the text, you're extirpating the fundamental role that we assign to play in the processes of de(con)struction and dis/semination?

Do you get a kick out of proving other people's points for them, Jacques?

Here, maybe this diagram clarifies things.

Seriously, guys. I don't believe in hell, but if I did, I'm pretty sure it would consist of having to assemble an infinitely large bookcase using only a set of instructions that Derrida "wrote" and Lacan diagrammed.

Likes this.

Stop "liking" all my posts and say something original for once, Michel!

 Likes this.

That's funny, Fred: I said something similar in this one book that I wrote DECADES AGO. >:(

For the last time, I never read your stupid book. In fact, no one read your stupid book until someone happened to notice it sounded a little like ME, minus the INSIGHT.

Interesting, interesting, interesting. You see, Søren also recalls writing something very similar many years ago.

Listen, Churchyard, I know you're still sore that your greatest (by which I mean "least worst") books were written under a pseudonym, but please please PLEASEstop referring to yourself in the third person!

Just thought I'd drop in. It's nice to see you're still holding on to such bourgeois notions of individuality.

Didn't I de-friend you, Karl?

Yeah, I guess they're not as bad as they sound. (Snickers.)

You know, Ted, that joke wasn't funny the first time you made it, either.

HI EVERYBODY. I JUST WANT TO LET EVERYONE KNOW THAT I gOT OUT OF THE HOSPITAL TODAY A/ND IT WAS JUST A MOLE. SO NOTHING TO WORRY ABOUT

You have never not been 70 years old, have you, Kant?

Likes this.

Likes this.

Excuse me?

Gee, I wonder who's not invited to my next orgy.

Guess whose books I'm deconstructing next?

Seriously, Fred? Have you been living underground for the past century? Oh, wait…

Burn.