Asset Base
  
The value of your company’s assets, often used to secure a loan.
The calculation of your assets doesn't change if you, say, spend a ton of dough stocking up on inventory. Like if you're a zombie fashion hosiery company and you're stocking up on um...stockings (the thick kind that keep zombie goop inside their bodies) you'll spend a lot of cash to buy that inventory. But the calculation of your assets inherently doesn't change. Rather, the assets go from very liquid (i.e. in the form of cash) to very illiquid in the form of hard-to-sell zombie hosiery.
Lenders care about asset bases because it is what drives their perception of risk in lending you money. If you're Apple or Google with $100 billion just in cash on the books, how well would a lender sleep loaning the company $10 billion in Australia to build out a manufacturing facility if that ten is backed by the hundred in the U.S.? Yeah, probably little sleep lost.
But now instead of GOOG, it's loaning money to Best Buy who may or may not even be around in 10 years. So they'd want to know about that asset base...like if Best Buy actually OWNED instead of leased their stores, there's at least a load of assets behind the loan that the lender could sell to get their money back. Zombie Apocalypses happen all the time so lender sensitivity to asset base size... matters.
Related or Semi-related Video
![Finance: What is collateral?](https://media1.shmoop.com/video/thumbnails/COURSE.FINANCE.429_770x433.jpg)
Finance: What is collateral?98 Views
Karl Marx was a fiercely bearded German economist and philosopher.
seriously look at beard .fierce. with the help of his equally bushy pal Friedrich [Marx pictured]
angles Marx wrote a little book that would have enormous influence on the
Russian revolutionaries of the early 20th century. that book of course was
called Little House on the Prairie. it's just making sure you're with us. it
was actually called the communist manifesto. so let's break it down .the
world according to Marx suffers because of social classes. well in the Western
world we started with feudalism as the class system .if you were a king life was
groovy. if you were a serf and not so much. feudalism crashed and burned and
capitalism rolled in with its booze huazi and proletariat classes. well
according to the Communist Manifesto capitalism was much much much worse than
feudalism. why ?because the booze huazi or owners are the means of production who [communist manifesto pictured]
embraced capitalism would do anything to make a dollar.
this included dehumanizing abusing and manipulating the proletariat or worker
class who toiled on their behalf. so Marx and Engels believed that capitalism
caused enormous suffering and hardship in the modern world. furthermore it
caused corruption because the government was essentially in cahoots with the
bourgeoisie. thanks to the unfairness inherent in capitalism Marxism states
that the proletariat and bourgeoisie will forever be butting heads .more
importantly that tension will eventually result in a revolution of the masses. and
just what would that revolution look like? well Marx and Engels had a few
ideas .there would be no private ownership of land. there would be no
inheritance rights. the state would control the means of communication and
transport .and instead of laboring in factories kids would go to school where
they'd get a free education. the communist manifesto posits that Marxism
would succeed where other forms of socialism had failed because communists
would always put the proletariat first. furthermore other forms of socialism
were nothing more than programs for small reforms .if the ship of the worker [different ships with different forms of government written on sails]
was going to be set right full-blown an all-out revolution was needed.
and that's what Marxism was all about. Marx and Engels like to think that
Germany would be ground zero for the proletariat takeover.
they probably rolled over in their graves when Hitler came to power, but
never fear the Communist Manifesto was a home run for one group. da the Russians.
at the turn of the 20th century there were two divisions of the Russian social
democratic Labour Party .the Bolsheviks and the Mensheviks many of whom had been
kicked out of Russia for being naughty revolutionaries spent about a decade
meeting in pubs in London. over a nice warm pint they'd argue about whose
interpretation of Marxism was correct and what the best method for taking over
Russia was .well frankly we would have picked somewhere tropical for our
communist revolution but well to each his own. while the Mensheviks and [Castro pictured]
Bolsheviks both wanted Russia to ditch capitalism and the Czar their
medium-term goals were quite different. well the Mensheviks wanted to work with
Russian officials already in office to build a kind of democratic system that
would make Russia a better place for everyone. Bolsheviks wanted to burn it
all down. well if you're wondering where Vladimir Lenin is and all this wonder no
more it was at the head of the Bolsheviks. he thought the Mensheviks
were wusses and that Russia's communist government would need to be small and
tightly controlled so that the masses wouldn't rebel. anywho after all those
years of plotting abroad the Mensheviks and Bolsheviks finally saw an
opportunity to get things going in 1917. and viva la revolucion. but that's for [mob of Russians protest]
another video. what, you thought we'd give you all the fun stuff right now?
Up Next
What is Deficit Financing? Deficit financing happens when the government has to borrow money to spend because what they are spending is more than w...
What is off balance sheet financing? Hit play to find out.
What are Assets Under Management? The assets under management figure is the market value of all of the investment assets that a financial instituti...
What is a Bulge Bracket Firm? The bulge bracket firm is the firm that issues the largest number of securities during an IPO or new issue. These are...