We have changed our privacy policy. In addition, we use cookies on our website for various purposes. By continuing on our website, you consent to our use of cookies. You can learn about our practices by reading our privacy policy.

The Republic Narrator:

Who is the narrator, can she or he read minds, and, more importantly, can we trust her or him?

First Person (Central Narrator)

Even though the Republic is technically a "dialogue," we hear all about this dialogue from Plato himself. Now, Plato must have had a killer memory to keep track of this 300-page discussion—assuming this is even an accurate transcription of a real dialogue that actually happened, which is unlikely.

While Socrates doesn't spend a lot of time sharing his feelings, we do get a sneak peak at his anxiety during his argument with an angry Thrasymachus: "I was astounded when I heard [Thrasymachus], and, looking at him, I was frightened" (336d).

Socrates's (and Plato's) potential unreliability as a narrator also comes out a few times when he reveals that he's been making some edits in how things happened: "Now, Thrasymachus did not agree to all of this so easily as I tell it now..." (350d). It's possible that Plato is reminding us that we're reading Socrates's version of events and is inviting us to not necessarily trust every detail he describes.