We have changed our privacy policy. In addition, we use cookies on our website for various purposes. By continuing on our website, you consent to our use of cookies. You can learn about our practices by reading our privacy policy.

ShmoopTube

Where Monty Python meets your 10th grade teacher.

Search Thousands of Shmoop Videos


Grammar and Usage Videos 37 videos

ACT English 1.1 Grammar and Usage
752 Views

ACT English: Grammar and Usage Drill 1, Problem 1. What should replace the underlined word?

ACT English 1.2 Grammar and Usage
571 Views

ACT English: Grammar and Usage Drill 1, Problem 2. Does the underlined word match the subject and tense?

ACT English 1.3 Grammar and Usage
645 Views

ACT English: Grammar and Usage Drill 1, Problem 3. Which answer best matches the subject of the sentence?

See All

ACT English 4.7 Passage Drill 177 Views


Share It!


Description:

ACT English: Passage Drill 4, Problem 7. Which form of "own" works best in this sentence?

Language:
English Language

Transcript

00:03

Here’s your Shmoop du jour, brought to you by the Hong Kong Noodle Company.

00:07

Which went out of business when King Kong Noodle Co. squished it flat.

00:22

How would you correct this underlined segment from the passage, if at all?

00:26

owning?

00:29

And here are the potential answers...

00:34

The second part of the sentence is a modifier for "a Chinese-American named David (Tsung) Jung."

00:42

(No relation to Carl Jung, we’re guessing...but crazier things have happened.)

00:46

It’s this modifier’s job to describe Jung by telling us that he owned

00:52

the Hong Kong Noodle Company in L.A.

00:54

Currently, however, the modifier just isn’t getting the job done.

00:57

Choice (A) suggests the word “owning,”

00:59

but this makes it sound like Jung currently owns the Company.

01:02

The passage makes it clear that fortune cookies were invented a long time ago, so we highly

01:06

doubt Jung is still on the planet. Hopefully, he’s still making fortune cookies in that

01:11

big noodle company in the sky.

01:15

If context weren’t enough to cut this option, the verb “invented” also makes it clear

01:20

that we should speak of Jung in the past tense. Choice (A) is officially nixed.

01:25

Option (D).

01:26

(D) gives us the phrase “being the owner of.”

01:29

This has the same present tense connotations as (A), so we’re sure it’s wrong.

01:34

It’s also too wordy, which Jung would hate if the succinct messages in fortune cookies

01:38

are an indication of his literary taste.

01:42

We’ve narrowed our options down to (B) and (C).

01:45

Both are in the past tense, so they’ve got that going for them.

01:47

However, they’re having a disagreement over the use of the pronouns “who” and “whom.”

01:53

A lot of people get mixed up with this, but it’s pretty simple when broken down.

01:56

The trick is knowing that “who” is in the subjective case and “whom” is in the object.

02:06

Subjective? Objective? Whaaa? No worries; it’s simple.

02:10

The subject of a clause is the person, place, or thing that’s doing something, while the

02:14

object is the person, place, or thing having something done to it.

02:21

Take this sentence for example: “Zoe loves her pet chinchilla.”

02:25

Zoe is the one doing the loving, so she’s the subject.

02:29

Her pet chinchilla, on the other hand, is the one receiving the love, making it the object.

02:34

(We’re not sure if the chinchilla loves Zoe, but it’s probably none of our business.)

02:38

OK, let’s zoom back to the Hong Kong Noodle Company and figure out this who/whom thing.

02:43

Both of these pronouns are trying to stand in for Jung, right?

02:46

We’ll sub in Jung’s name and read the clause out loud to help us determine if the

02:51

blank requires the subjective or objective case.

02:55

“Jung owned the Hong Kong Noodle Company in Los Angeles.”

02:58

Here, Jung is the subject because he’s the one owning something, while the Hong Kong

03:03

Noodle Company is the object because it’s the thing being owned.

03:07

Since Jung is the subject, the pronoun that stands in for him has to be in the subjective case.

03:12

Thus, we declare choice (B) the correct answer

03:14

because the sentence requires the subjective pronoun “who.”

03:17

We also need to stop binge watching Dr. Who,

03:20

but that’s a personal struggle we’ll deal with on our own.

Related Videos

ACT English 2.2 Punctuation
2070 Views

ACT English: Punctuation Drill 2, Problem 2. Where should the semi-colon be placed?

ACT English 3.1 Punctuation
1066 Views

ACT English: Punctuation Drill 3, Problem 1. How should this sentence be changed so that it is grammatically correct?

ACT English 3.2 Punctuation
973 Views

ACT English: Punctuation Drill 3, Problem 2. How should we properly hyphenate the words in this sentence?

ACT English 3.4 Punctuation
523 Views

ACT English: Punctuation Drill 3, Problem 4. Which choice best formats this list of items?

ACT English 2.1 Punctuation
519 Views

ACT English: Punctuation Drill 2, Problem 1. Which choice of punctuation best completes the sentence?