We have changed our privacy policy. In addition, we use cookies on our website for various purposes. By continuing on our website, you consent to our use of cookies. You can learn about our practices by reading our privacy policy.

The Nicomachean Ethics Book 5, Chapter 6 (1134a17-1134b18) Summary

  • Aristotle says that it's possible to commit an injustice without being an unjust person. So just how awful do you have to be in order to be called unjust?
  • First, Aristotle has to figure out who is a candidate for justice (hint: it's not for everybody).
  • It is only for those to whom the law applies—for those living in a community, a political entity. Without community, there is no law—and therefore, no injustice is possible.
  • The law keeps things in balance—not humans.
  • If humans took it into their hands without the guidance of the law, rulers would always become tyrants.
  • That's because humans would choose more of the good and less of the bad for themselves if left to their own devices.
  • Aristotle says that a ruler should be a "guardian of the just," distributing what is good proportionally and fairly.
  • What does a ruler stand to gain if he doesn't hoard all of the good for himself? In being just, he earns honor and privilege—which are the highest goods.
  • The term "just" is relative. Aristotle claims that there can be no injustice from either a father or a slavemaster, since "things" aren't part of a system of justice. Um. Yikes.
  • Children are considered part of the father's body (at least, until they come of age)—and it isn't possible to be unjust to oneself.
  • Justice can be applied to a man's wife, but not in the political sense as Aristotle has defined it, since there is no law in that community of two.