ShmoopTube

00:03

All right yes i reading bumpers next up in our

00:05

fast food high schools wrestling match questions We'll just jump

00:09

right into it and skipping the text later In context

00:12

which of the following revisions omits the author's bias from

00:16

sentenced tend right Since ten was right there I'm all

00:20

for the coming partnerships so he's saying i'm i'm for

00:24

the murder of mick high school right So which of

00:28

these omits the bias We want something neutral so a

00:36

is clearly not coming partnership are really smart partner to

00:39

run around The only way to go way try would

00:42

offer students many benefits Okay we'll see is pretty neutral

00:45

relatively there we would be turning down a great opportunity

00:48

for you all right Those are all political statements there

00:50

other than si well this is something we all have

00:53

most of shmoop family are particularly bias toward shiny objects

00:56

and baked goods with chocolate price isn't something that should

01:00

necessarily be broadcast loudly in an essay though a little

01:04

implied bias goes a long way as it is less

01:06

likely to alienate readers Read the new york times the

01:09

wall street journal and you get a grip there a

01:11

statement such as i'm all for it can be revised

01:15

into a statement that supports the claim such as well

01:18

it offers many benefits Yeah this is an objective fact

01:22

without the color of any bias so see it is

01:27

and loser bull you know all the rest of these

01:29

air clearly biased statements you'd expect to read them in

01:32

a you know in a newspaper similar so that's it 00:01:35.466 --> [endTime] we're done we're shmoop chrissy

Full Transcript