The narrator reflects back to the 1930s from a point ten years after the end of World War II and the devastating consequences of the Holocaust.
While the 1945 Nuremberg Trials of Nazis and their associates are never mentioned, they are certainly in the backdrop as the narrator considers his employer's engagement with Nazi diplomats and flirtations with British fascism in the years leading up to the war.
Is Stevens's employer actually guilty? Is Stevens himself, simply by virtue of working for his employer, also guilty, or can he claim the "Nuremberg defense": that he was only acting on orders from his superior? The novel takes on the form of a defense or confession as the narrator carefully reflects over his past experiences and possible guilt.
Questions About Guilt and Blame
- Why does Lord Darlington suffer so much public disgrace after World War II?
- Do you think Lord Darlington is responsible for his actions? Did he knowingly cooperate with the Nazis, with a full awareness of their genocidal aims? Or was he taken advantage of? Does having good intentions make him any less guilty? Draw on specific instances in the novel to support your responses.
- Consider Stevens's and Miss Kenton's behavior when Lord Darlington asks him to fire the Jewish maids. Do you think they acted appropriately? Do you think they should feel guilty for complying with Lord Darlington's request? What would you have done in their shoes?
- Mr. Cardinal takes Stevens to task for not being curious or critical enough of Lord Darlington's activities. Do you think Mr. Cardinal has a point? Why or why not?
Chew on This
Through the course of The Remains of the Day, Stevens gradually comes to some recognition of his guilt in his association with Lord Darlington.
Even through the loyal and largely uncritical perspective of his butler, Lord Darlington's actions still seem blameworthy.